arianagrell6 arianagrell6
  • 13-09-2018
  • Mathematics
contestada

Solve the inequality -6>-2/3

Respuesta :

MrGumby
MrGumby MrGumby
  • 13-09-2018

There is no need to solve this inequality. Since there is no variable, there is nothing that you can solve. However, it is a false statement as -6 is not larger than -2/3

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

For the multivariate normal model, turns out that the Jeffreys' rule for generating a prior distribution on (θ,Σ) givesπ(θ,Σ) ∝ |Σ|⁻⁽ᵖ⁺²⁾/²can we Derive the ful
Am i allowed to put the maximum amount of pretax dollars in my 401k and another 7,000 after tax into a roth ira in 2024?
The shortest distance between the lines (x - 5)/1 = (y - 2)/2 = (z - 4)/-3 and is (x + 3)/1 = (y + 5)/4 = (z - 1)/-5 A. 7√3B. 6√3C. 4√3D. 5√3
In order for public opinion to guide government, according to the authors, what condition(s) must be met? Question 16Select one: a. The people know what they wa
Like Socrates, King is a gadfly or stinging insect. A. True B. False
Suppy a systematic name for the monatomic anions: (a) F- (b) Cl- (c) Br- (d) I-
The mean weight of 150 students in a certain class is 60 kilograms. The mean weight of boys in the class is 70 kilograms and that of the girls is 55 kilograms,
At 1127 K and 1 atmosphere pressure, a gaseous mixture of CO and CO₂ in equilibrium with solid carbon has 90.55 of CO by mass. C₍ₛ₎ + CO₂₍₎ ⥩ 2CO₎Calculate K fo
What core knowledge is necessary for all paralegals?
What is a prerequisite for the Business Unit Switcher and other features?